Model Number PED-400-14 |
Device Problem
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/16/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The pipeline flex remains implanted in the patient and will not be returned for evaluation.The reported event could not be confirmed and the event cause could not be determined from the reported information.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received report that a patient required retreatment after pipeline flex implantation.The patient underwent pipeline flex implantation to treat a saccular aneurysm in the right c6 internal carotid artery (ica).Aneurysm dome was 4.4mm and neck diameter was 3.4mm.Seven months post-procedure, it was discovered that the pipeline flex had migrated and foreshortened.There were no reports of patient injury as a result of the migration.One month later, the patient received an additional flow diversion device as a result of the migration.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information based on information obtained through follow up, the reported device foreshortening was related to the curve in the anatomy and balloon angioplasty procedure to improve wall apposition resulted in 3 mm neck coverage.Over the period of approximately six (6) months, there was straightening of the vessel curvature due to vessel remodeling resulting in the distal end of the device no longer covering the aneurysm neck.Based on our investigation this event is not related to a device failure, rather associated with patient anatomical location and physiological vessel remodeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received additional information: the pipeline flex had been deployed in a vessel curve.Balloon angioplasty was used for better wall apposition of the pipeline flex.Immediately post-procedure, the pipeline flex had 3mm of coverage distal to the aneurysm neck.The aneurysm landing zone artery diameter was 3.15mm distal and 4.15mm proximal.Seven months post-procedure, the patient underwent a follow up cerebral angiogram to assess the outcome of the pipeline flex implantation.It was reported that the distal end of the pipeline flex no longer covered the aneurysm neck.The angiogram showed that distal neck of the aneurysm was ¿only subtotally covered¿; the pipeline flex appeared to have had ¿interval minimal foreshortening¿.In addition, it was reported that ¿there is a tiny component of the distal device now partially projecting into the neck of the aneurysm.¿ the physician confirmed that the distal foreshortening of the device was related to the patient¿s anatomy and related to the vessel remodeling of the parent artery.There was no change to the aneurysm size.The patient was asymptomatic.Eight months after the initial pipeline flex implantation, an additional pipeline flex device was placed across the partially exposed neck of the aneurysm.The procedure resulted in flow stagnation within the aneurysm.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|