• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST Back to Search Results
Model Number 200432
Device Problems Device Issue (2379); Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456); High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/24/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation conclusion: investigation pending.
 
Event Description
Report received of discrepant inratio values.(b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation/conclusion: it is indicated that the product is not returning for evaluation.Therefore, a review of the entire in-house testing history of the lot was performed.In-house testing on strip lot 373678a was found to be performing within expectations.A review of the manufacturing records for the lot did not uncover any non-conformances.The lot meets release specification.The customer did not provide a laboratory reference value for comparison.Unable to determine the accuracy of the inratio result without this information.Root cause cannot be determined from the information provided.Based on the information available, there is no indication of a product deficiency.No corrective action is required at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation/conclusion: the meter associated with the complaint was returned for investigation.In-house testing on retained test strips met accuracy criteria.Functional and thermistor testing were performed on the returned meter with passing results.The customer's reported issue was not replicated during in-house investigation.The product performed as expected.A review of the entire in-house testing history of the lot was performed.In-house testing on the reported strip lot met release criteria.The product performed as expected.A review of the manufacturing records for the lot did not uncover any non-conformances.The lot met release specifications.The customer did not provide a reference value for comparison.It is not possible to verify if a discrepancy exists without this information.Root cause cannot be determined from the information provided.Based on the information available, there is no indication of a product deficiency.No corrective action is required at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The meter associated with the complaint was returned for investigation.In-house testing on retained test strips met accuracy criteria.Functional and thermistor testing were performed on the returned meter with passing results.The customer's reported issue was not replicated during in-house investigation.The product performed as expected.A statistical analysis of the impedance curves generated using the customer's reported inratio inr results determined that the curves associate with the reported result of 6.0 on (b)(6) 2016 and historic result of 7.0 on (b)(6) 2016 did not exhibit a weak or abnormal slope.However, the result of 6.0 obtained on (b)(6) 2016 was found to exhibit a weak slope change.The issue of weak-slope changes is related to the algorithm software on the meter and is known to contribute to discrepant results.This issue was addressed in (b)(4).With the exception of the weak-slope observed on the customer's returned meter, in-house testing shows that the system is performing within expectations.A review of the entire in-house testing history of the lot was performed.In-house testing on the reported strip lot met release criteria.The product performed as expected.The manufacturing records for the lot were reviewed and the lot met release specifications.The customer did not provide a reference value for comparison.It is not possible to verify if a discrepancy exists without this information.Root cause cannot be determined from the information provided.(b)(4) identified impedance curves with weak slopes as potentially leading to discrepant inr values.Further investigation is being performed under (b)(4) for this issue.Corrections: removed inratio pt/inr test strips (as the complaint device) and added the inratio2 pt monitoring system (monitor).Model #: removed inratio pt/inr test strip and added the monitor model 200432.Lot#: removed inratio pt/inr test strip lot number and included serial number of monitor as above.Removed the monitor as a concomitant medical product and added the inratio pt/inr test strips.The 510k#: removed the inratio pt/inr test strip 510k# k092987 and added k072727 to reflect the inratio2 pt monitoring system.Labeled for single use?: changed from "yes" to "no" since the monitor is not a single use device.Usage of device: changed from "unknown" to "reuse" since the monitor is not a single use device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
9975 summers ridge road
san diego CA 92121
Manufacturer Contact
ya-ling king
9975 summers ridge road
san diego, CA 92121
8588052084
MDR Report Key5514808
MDR Text Key41137182
Report Number2027969-2016-00182
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072727
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/24/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number200432
Device Lot Number373678A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/05/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/24/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/21/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/23/2016
06/28/2016
08/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Removal/Correction NumberZ-0880, 0881, 0882-2015
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-