(b)(4).Device malfunctioned intra-operatively and was not utilized nor was it implanted / explanted complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received (b)(4).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Dhr review - manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 03 july 2015.Expiry date: 01 june 2025.No ncr's were generated during production that would contribute to the complaint condition.The review of the device history record shows that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to the complaint condition device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: during an unknown surgical procedure, the plate continuously slid off the groove which connects to the cage.The surgeon attempted to place the device twice, however a new implant needed to be opened to use in place of the malfunctioning device.The surgery was then successfully completed.There was a thirty minute surgical delay reported.The patient was reportedly in stable condition.This is report 1 of 1 for com-(b)(4).
|