• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310030
Device Problem Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/22/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the burr got burnt over rota wire.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery.A 1.50mm rotalink plus was selected to be used.During the procedure, fast rotation was performed when setting up the device.Then, it was noted that burr got burnt over the rotawire although the cocktail water was filled.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and patient's condition was good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the complaint unit was carried out and no issues were noted.The advancer knob was locked upon return in a backward position; it was loosened and advanced in order to inspect the handshake connection.The handshake connection was inspected and no damage was noted.A handshake connection test was attempted to examine the integrity of the connection and no issues were noted.The drive shaft, coil and sheath were inspected and there was no damage noted.The burr was microscopically examined.The annulus was noted to be blocked/ damaged.A scratch test was performed to confirm if the returned burrs cutting action was acceptable.The diamond plated area of the burr was scratched along the side of a single edge blade.When the side of the blade was visually examined, a scratch mark from where the burr came into contact with the side of the blade was noted.This confirmed that the burrs cutting action was acceptable.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the burr got burnt over rota wire.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and severely calcified left anterior descending artery.A 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus was selected to be used.During the procedure, fast rotation was performed when setting up the device.Then, it was noted that burr got burnt over the rotawire although the cocktail water was filled.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and patient's condition was good.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5523170
MDR Text Key41067420
Report Number2134265-2016-02328
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/25/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2017
Device Model NumberH749236310030
Device Catalogue Number23631-003
Device Lot Number0018637429
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/25/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/24/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/18/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-