(b)(4).The complaint device was returned for evaluation.The reported dilator leak was confirmed via returned device analysis.The investigation determined the dilator leak was related to the unstable rhv cap; however, a cause for the unstable rhv cap could not be determined.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is filed to report that a leak was observed on the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) cap during preparation, and if were to reocurr in the anatomy, has the potential to compromise the fluid path integrity of the device, which may cause or contribute to air embolism.It was reported that during preparation of the steerable guiding catheter (sgc) on the prep table, the device was prepared per the instructions for use (ifu).While flushing the sgc, a leak was noted at the rotating hemostasis valve (rhv) cap.The cap was tightened and the leaking stopped.The dilator was then inserted into the sgc and the leaking was observed again.The rhv cap was confirmed to be tight.The decision was made to replace the device.The sgc was not used.There was no patient involvement and no clinically significant delay in therapy.No additional information was provided.
|