• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK 4 MM AGGRESSIVE BLADE PLUS; FMS BLADES & BURRS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK 4 MM AGGRESSIVE BLADE PLUS; FMS BLADES & BURRS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 283419
Device Problem Metal Shedding Debris (1804)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 02/25/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Associated medwatch for other devices used in this procedure: 1221934-2016-10117, 1221934-2016-10118, 1221934-2016-10120 and 1221934-2016-10121.(b)(4).The lot expiration date is currently unavailable.Awaiting device return.
 
Event Description
During a meniscal resection the shaverblade leaves cuttings in the knee (picture comes with the blade ).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Five complaint devices were received and evaluated.All five devices are from the same lot.Visual observation of two of the five devices, revealed no anomalies with the blades, or the sleeves surface.The inner and outer sleeves were separated and inspected for any damage for the other three devices.All three devices had signs of friction and striation marks on the surface of the distal end of the inner sleeve.The friction marks indicate excessive friction between the sleeves, which could lead to metal shavings as reported.Therefore, the reported failure can be confirmed.A batch record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no other complaint of any type for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.A white paper was performed previously on this failure and the result indicated that the amount of shedding for this product is acceptable.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
4 MM AGGRESSIVE BLADE PLUS
Type of Device
FMS BLADES & BURRS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jason busch
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088808210
MDR Report Key5536743
MDR Text Key41513535
Report Number1221934-2016-10119
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK13191
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/29/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2020
Device Catalogue Number283419
Device Lot NumberM1508030
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/08/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer02/29/2016
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/29/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/30/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/06/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-