It was reported that a patient was not feeling magnet mode stimulation.The physician tried using several different magnets, but the patient did not feel magnet stimulation.The physician then checked the magnet activation count, and the count had not increased after interrogation.The last recorded swipe was from (b)(6) 2015, and the patient stated that she had swiped the magnet many times since then.The physician then increased the magnet mode output current, and he swiped the magnet again.The patient then felt stimulation, and the magnet swipe registered in the magnet activation count after re-interrogation.The physician then decreased the magnet mode again and swiped the magnet, but the magnet activation count did not increment.The physician then increased the magnet mode output current back to the higher output current that the patient could feel.Programming history was reviewed, and the impedance dcdc code was 2 in 2014.The impedance was dcdc code 0 on (b)(6) 2016.There was no indication that low impedance was present because no clinical symptoms had been reported.No further relevant information has been received to date.
|
Programming history was reviewed on (b)(6) 2016.Data from (b)(6) 2016 showed that the output current was increased from 2.0ma to 2.25ma twice, as the physician previously reported.System diagnostics were performed with normal results.The magnet history showed that the device started at 137 magnet activations and ended at 142 magnet activations on (b)(6) 2016.This does show that the magnet activations did occur, but it cannot be determined when the activations occurred during the office visit in relation to the settings.The patient had generator replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2016, but the explanting facility does not return product to the manufacturer.Therefore, no analysis could be performed.
|