• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® TAG® THORACIC ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® TAG® THORACIC ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number TGU454520
Device Problems Bent (1059); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/14/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016, a patient was being treated for a thoracic aortic aneurysm with several gore® tag® thoracic endoprostheses.It was reported the patient had very tortuous anatomy and prior to inserting the sheath, several dilators were used to make sure the sheath would advance.The sheath was advanced over a lundquist stiff wire.It was noted that upon advancing the sheath on fluro that the sheath was slightly bent (not kinked).The tgu454520 was advanced and deployed without issue.While the physician was removing the catheter for the tgu454520 the leading olive got stuck halfway down in the sheath.The physician used force to pull the catheter and the leading olive popped off in the sheath.The sheath was removed with the leading olive remaining inside the sheath.A new sheath was used and the remaining devices were implanted without issue.The patient tolerated the procedure.The dsl2428 and the tgu454520 catheter will be returned to gore for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The review of the manufacturing paperwork verified that the lot(s) met all pre-release specifications.The results of the engineering evaluation are as follows: the device evaluation for the conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis showed the following: the leading end of the dual lumen separated from the remainder of the catheter body.The condition of the broken leading end of the conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis catheter was indicative of necking and breaking of the dual lumen.The findings from the evaluation are consistent with the physician¿s observations.The root cause for the leading end of the dual lumen detaching from the conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis catheter was the retraction of the catheter against resistance.The indications for use section of the ifu states, ¿do not continue advancement or retraction of the guidewire, sheath, or delivery catheter if resistance is felt.Stop and assess the cause of resistance.Vessel, endoprosthesis, or delivery catheter damage may occur.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® TAG® THORACIC ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL WOODY SPRINGS B/P
3450 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
natalie putnam
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key5547257
MDR Text Key42613436
Report Number2017233-2016-00318
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/29/2018
Device Catalogue NumberTGU454520
Device Lot Number14490998
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/24/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received04/05/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
Patient Weight75
-
-