Description according to complainant: following an intubation, when withdrawing the device, the device was crushed & bent at the distal end.Additional information received 23mar2016: ".The procedure was performed with an army single lumen ett." patient outcome: a section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
(b)(4).Summary of investigational findings; it is not evident, if the frova introducer was actually damaged during use or prior to, since reported that "upon removal of the frova introducer, it was found that the distal extremity of the device was bent & crushed.The other device of the same package are ok." however, at a later date it is reported that "the procedure was performed with an army single lumen ett." no product was returned and without the actual complaint device to assist the investigation it is not possible to comment on the device, which following an intubation "was crushed & bent at the distal end", and the exact reason for the difficulties encountered cannot be determined.It is reported that "the patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence." and "according to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence." investigation found no evidence to suggest product was not manufactured according to specifications, but cook medical will continue to monitor for similar reports.(b)(4).Summary of investigational findings; it is not evident, if the frova introducer was actually damaged during use or prior to, since reported that "upon removal of the frova introducer, it was found that the distal extremity of the device was bent & crushed.The other device of the same package are ok." however, at a later date it is reported that "the procedure was performed with an army single lumen ett." no product was returned and without the actual complaint device to assist the investigation it is not possible to comment on the device, which following an intubation "was crushed & bent at the distal end", and the exact reason for the difficulties encountered cannot be determined.It is reported that "the patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence." and "according to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence." investigation found no evidence to suggest product was not manufactured according to specifications, but cook medical will continue to monitor for similar reports.
|
Description according to complainant: following an intubation, when withdrawing the device, the device was crushed & bent at the distal end.Additional information received 23mar2016: ¿¿the procedure was performed with an army single lumen ett.¿ patient outcome: a section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|