• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS INNOVA IGS 530; ANGIOGRAPHIC X-RAY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS INNOVA IGS 530; ANGIOGRAPHIC X-RAY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number XCA320
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Radiation Overexposure (3017)
Patient Problems Chemical Exposure (2570); No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 03/03/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Ge healthcare¿s investigation into the reported occurrence is still ongoing.A follow-up report will be issued when the investigation has been completed.
 
Event Description
The hospital reported that the patient received a peak skin dose around 7.57 gy in the same body area but did not report radiation burn or adverse effect to patient.No injury has been reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer reported to a ge healthcare (gehc) technical engineer that an exam performed on (b)(6) 2016 exceeded the dose threshold limit of 5gy.No injury has been reported.Initial analysis indicated that the patient received a peak skin dose of 7.57 gy in the same body area during the exam procedure.Further gehc engineering investigation analysis was performed using information from the gehc field engineer and logs from the system which showed that the total exam duration for this exam was 2 h 3 min with a total dose of 7.571 gy, 6.046 gy from fluoroscopy acquisitions and 1.525 gy from digital subtraction angiography (dsa) acquisitions, and the peak incident dose was 4.6 gy.The most probable root cause for the high dose would be a long exam performed on a large patient with appropriate acquisition settings.Acquisition settings were selected by the user based on the physician's clinical judgment for obtaining the best image quality for diagnosis.The patient did not sustain any radiation induced injury.Because the localized skin peak dose was less than 7.5 gy, the likelihood of permanent radiation damage is remote.This system is not covered under a gehc service contract.All system calibrations were completed successfully and there was no indication of any system malfunction.Detailed instructions on reducing dose and improving image quality are provided in the innova igs systems cardiovascular imaging system operator manual.These instructions have been reviewed and found to be appropriate.No system malfunction has been identified.The system worked as intended and per specifications.No further action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INNOVA IGS 530
Type of Device
ANGIOGRAPHIC X-RAY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS
283 rue de la miniere
buc 78530
FR  78530
Manufacturer (Section G)
GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS
283 rue de la miniere
buc 78530
FR   78530
Manufacturer Contact
joseph seliga
3000 n grandview blvd.
waukesha, WI 53188
MDR Report Key5555204
MDR Text Key42098141
Report Number9611343-2016-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IZI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122457
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberXCA320
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/07/2016
Initial Date FDA Received04/07/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/26/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient Weight116
-
-