• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST Back to Search Results
Model Number 200432
Device Problem Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problems Test Result (2695); No Information (3190)
Event Date 03/15/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is pending.
 
Event Description
It was reported via telephone call that on (b)(6) 2016, the patient's inratio inr was 1.1.The patient's therapeutic range was 2.0 - 3.0.After the inratio inr result was reported to the physician, the physician requested that the patient have a laboratory inr drawn for comparison.The laboratory inr was 5.1.The time between testing was six (6) hours.The patient was hospitalized for elevated inr.At this time, no additional information is known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please make the following corrections: correct brand name to read: inratio2 pt monitoring system.Correct model and lot # to read: model #200432.Change concomitant medical products from "inratio monitor sn (b)(4)" to "inratio pt/inr test strips, model #100071".Correct pma# to read: k072727.Conclusion: the monitor associated with the complaint was returned for investigation.A statistical analysis of the impedance curve associated with the customer's result of 1.1 found that the curve exhibited an abnormal shape.Capa investigation (capa (b)(4)) has determined that impedance curves with weak slope change and an abnormal shape can cause discrepant results.The inratio monitor software may generate an incorrect or discrepant inr result when the patient sample exhibits a weak-slope change impedance curve.The capa investigation has also determined that certain patient conditions can contribute to weak slope change impedance curves.There are no known patient conditions provided by the customer that would lead to the observed weak slope change.Donor testing was not pursued due to the software issue being identified as the root cause of the customer's discrepant results.The returned monitor met functional and thermistor testing requirements.A review of the entire testing history for lot 378770a was performed.In-house testing on strip lot 378770a meets release criteria.The manufacturing records for the lot 378770a were reviewed and did not uncover any non-conformances.Lot met release specifications.Capa (b)(4) identified impedance curves with weak slopes and abnormal shapes as potentially leading to discrepant inr values.Further investigation is being performed under capa (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INRATIO2 PT MONITORING SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
9975 summers ridge road
san diego CA 92121
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
9975 summers ridge road
san diego CA 92121
Manufacturer Contact
ya-ling king
9975 summers ridge road
san diego, CA 92121
8588052084
MDR Report Key5567318
MDR Text Key42413487
Report Number2027969-2016-00220
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072727
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/16/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number200432
Device Lot Number378770A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/09/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/16/2016
Initial Date FDA Received04/11/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/01/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Removal/Correction NumberZ-0880, 0881, 0882-2015
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-