• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP IMPLANT SYSTEMS SC/MSC PE-INSERT 32MM 48/50 SYM.; HIP ENDOPROSTHESES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP IMPLANT SYSTEMS SC/MSC PE-INSERT 32MM 48/50 SYM.; HIP ENDOPROSTHESES Back to Search Results
Model Number NH202
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Missing Value Reason (3192)
Event Date 02/10/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: on-going.
 
Event Description
Country of complaint: (b)(6).Implant (inlay) breakage after 4 years 4 months 3 weeks of being implanted.Original surgery date: (b)(6) 2011.Revision surgery date: (b)(6) 2016.Involved components: nk512t / bicontact s plasmapore 12/14 size 12mm / lot number 51713447 (not marketed in the u.S.).Nh048t / plasmacup sc size 48mm / lot number 51760438.Nk529k / isodur prosthesis head 12/14 32mm s / lot number 51746419.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: this case was discussed with specialist from the product management.Both components were investigated visually.The pe insert shows visible wear marks and abrasions.Furthermore a curvature is visible which indicates a lever out of the insert from the cup.In the sliding surface there are only little metal wear marks.This means that there is no third-body wear.The prothesis head shows visible surface changes respective a rough surface which may be caused by contact with the rim of the plasmacup.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all available lot numbers.The device history file has been checked and found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.No similar incidents have been filed with products from this these batches.Conclusion and root cause: based on the information available as well as a result of our investigation the root cause of the failure is most probably not product related.It could be possible that the insert tilted inside the acetabular cup because of luxation.Rational: we exclude a material or manufacturing problem, because the quality manufacturing documents have been checked and were found to be according to the valid specifications.There were no other complaints within this batch.Therefore a design, product or material failure can be excluded.Corrective action: according to sop sa-de13-m-4-2-01-010 a capa is not necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SC/MSC PE-INSERT 32MM 48/50 SYM.
Type of Device
HIP ENDOPROSTHESES
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP IMPLANT SYSTEMS
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
Manufacturer Contact
nicole broyles
615 lambert pointe drive
hazelwood, MO 63042
3145515988
MDR Report Key5571924
MDR Text Key42489156
Report Number3005673311-2016-00062
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K042344
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date04/01/2016
Device Model NumberNH202
Device Catalogue NumberNH202
Device Lot Number51756517
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/08/2016
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/04/2016
Initial Date FDA Received04/12/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/02/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/08/2011
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-