The device was returned and evaluated.An event regarding crack/fracture involving an unknown ceramic head was reported.The event was confirmed following visual inspection.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar).The inspection noted: the ceramic head was fractured.The head was reconstructed.Approximately (b)(6) of the head was returned.Secondary chipping was observed on a majority of the fracture surfaces.The reconstruction shows a generally longitudinal fracture pattern.This type of pattern is created by hoop stresses generated by the wedge-effect of the stem trunnion.The fracture pattern is consistent with the application of the device.Examination of the machined tapered surfaces showed whitening of the ceramic tapered surface.This whitened surface was consistent with the phase transformation of the zirconia from the tetragonal phase to the monoclinic phase, as reported in the clinical literature.That phase transformation can cause internal stresses in the base material.The observed fracture morphology is consistent with an overload fracture, with the crack propagating outward from the taper.Examination of the three fragments that make up the majority portion of the female head taper revealed a circumferential metallic band pattern.This is consistent with the trunnion being properly seated in the taper.Identification markings on the head were not visible.The material analysis report concluded: the insert contained gouging damage consistent with contact with the ceramic head fragments on the articulating surface.The returned fragments of the distal rim exhibited explantation damage.Based on the above, the highly stressed region of the ceramic machined tapered surface had undergone a phase transformation, which may have an effect on the structural integrity of the material.However, clinical and patient history may also play a role in the survivorship of any implant.As neither the clinical information nor the patient history was available at the time of this report, no definitive conclusion can be drawn as to the cause of fracture.This specific implant is no longer available for sale.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as device details, operative reports, x-rays, patient history & follow-up notes are needed to investigate this event further.If additional information becomes available this investigation will be reopened.
|