Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product development evaluation: a single application instrument (lot 9742168) was received for this non-manufacturing evaluation.No damages or deformations could be found on the returned device.During the functional check, it was noticed that the instrument had not been lubricated per the clinical reprocessing instructions provided by the manufacturer.This likely had an influence of the general handling of the instrument.The attempt to tension the first of five implants on a bone model confirmed a functional issue with the instrument.However, once the instrument was lubricated, the function was fully restored and the instrument worked per intent.It is therefore concluded that the reported malfunction of the instrument is related to the lack of lubrication during the clinical reprocessing cycle.No design related root cause is identified for the returned device.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|