It is confirmed from the device history record that the suspected device had been manufactured with no significant issue and passed all the inspections.It is confirmed from the returned device that only 6cm of fractured part of stent was returned to us and one wire of the fractured part was loose and broken.In addition, it is regarded that wire was affected by tensile strength rather than bending force or corrosion on the investigation of cross section of the wire.Fracture, which can occur in other company's device as well as ours, is affected by patient's lesion status, peristalsis of organs, and drug use.It is, however, impossible to find out exact root cause since there is no patient information and it is difficult to reconstruct the situation at the time of procedure.It is hard to determine as fracture caused by malfunction since no special thing was found from device history record.For "a.Patient information", we, (b)(4) and our distributor could not get more detailed patient information because the hospital did not open them such as "age at time of event", "date of birth", "sex" and "weight" the suspected device is not registered in the us.And we will continuously monitor whether similar or same complaint occurs.
|
On (b)(6) 2016: ddt2210 was implanted from gastric antrum to second portion of duodenum.On (b)(6) 2016: fracture was confirmed.Fractured end was found in ileocecal region.It was removed by an open abdominal surgery, concerning the risk of perforation and ileus, as well as further ae in the future.Reportedly, no particular ae was reported until the surgery took place.
|