|
Model Number LUCAS 2 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Tissue Damage (2104)
|
Event Date 04/05/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).A physio-control clinical specialist reviewed the reported information with the following observations and conclusion: the soft tissue injury on the chest is likely caused by the mechanical compressions from lucas during 25 minutes.This is one of the potential side effects per the instructions for use(1); the international liaison committee on resuscitation (ilcor) recognizes the following side effects of cpr: "rib fractures and other injuries are common but acceptable consequences of cpr given the alternative of death from cardiac arrest.After resuscitation, all patients should be reassessed and re-evaluated for resuscitation-related injuries." apart from the above, bruising and soreness of the chest are common during use of the lucas chest compression system.In this case the customer reported the stabilization straps were not used and the device was placed low, deeper on the chest due to the broken sternum and tilted to the right.The instructions for use provide the following contraindication and warning: contraindications do not use the lucas chest compression system in these cases: if it is not possible to position lucas safely or correctly on the patient's chest.Warning - incorrect position over chest.If the pressure pad is not in the correct position in relation to the sternum, there is an increased risk of damage to the rib cage and the internal organs.Also, the patient's blood circulation is compromised.Ref; http://www.Lucas-cpr.Com/doc_en/100666-01_rev_a_lucas2_ifu_gb_web2.Pdf physio continues to investigate the reported issue and will submit a supplemental report on this event to the fda as provided by 21 cfr 803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to physio-control that, following the use of a lucas 2 chest compression system, the patient exhibited significant soft tissue damage under the device suction cup and other thorax injuries.When paramedics arrived, the patient (a (b)(6) male) was found lying on the floor (indoors) with an unknown downtime.Manual cpr was provided for approximately 15 minutes.The patient's sternum broke during manual cpr.The paramedics then placed the lucas device on the patient whose chest had collapsed due to the broken sternum.When the device was placed on the patient's chest, it slightly tilted to the right side.No stabilization straps were used and the patient was not moved from his position on the floor.Mechanical cpr was provided for approximately 25 minutes with the lucas device.When the lucas device was removed from the patient, it was discovered that the patient had received significant soft tissue damage under the device suction cup and additional thorax injuries.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Physio-control evaluated the device and proper device operation was confirmed during functional and performance testing.The reported issue regarding device alarms was not duplicated.The cause of the reported issue regarding device alarms was not determined.There were no issues observed with the device related to the patient's skin damage.A damaged hood communication ribbon cable was replaced.The device was subsequently returned to the customer for use.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|