Catalog Number 03.501.080 |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 04/11/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient information is unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(6).A review of the device history records was attempted but the provided lot number could not be verified.Without a valid lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported during surgery it was not possible to tighten the zipfix instrument.They had one more instrument and the closure went well.Surgery was prolonged about five (5) minutes.Patient outcome was reported as good.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.A product development investigation and device history record review were performed for the subject device (application instrument for sternal zipfix, part number 03.501.080, lot number 8623617).The product development investigation showed little usage evidence and all screws and nuts were in place and tight.In this non-manufacturing complaint investigation it was determined that the application instrument has not been lubricated as per the manufacturer's instructions.Therefore the tensioning of the implant was not given as per the design intent.After the instrument was lubricated the function was restored.However, during the application functional testing with three implants it was noticed that the tensioning function was not given at about 20% of the activation attempts.The closer investigation showed that this issue is related to the deformed (bend inwards) subcomponent, "spring stop", which prevents the user from fully pulling the trigger.The device history record was researched, no abnormal findings were identified.There were no issues during the manufacturing of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Although the complaint condition was confirmed, a root cause could not be determined for the deformation of the ¿sring stop¿ component.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|