• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTERSECT ENT PROPEL SINUS IMPLANT; DRUG ELUTING SINUS STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTERSECT ENT PROPEL SINUS IMPLANT; DRUG ELUTING SINUS STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 70011
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem Discomfort (2330)
Event Date 04/06/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The surgeon reported the implant was correctly positioned (aligned to the anterior edge of the middle turbinate).There was no repositioning/adjustment of the implants after placement.The implant was well opposed to sinus mucosa.The following is being provided as this device is a combination product: name: propel, dose, frequency & route used: (1) 370 ug implant, diagnosis for use: sinus surgery.Combination product -yes.Age, weight, lot number are unknown.
 
Event Description
The patient underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ess) and concomitant septoplasty with septal splints to treat chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps.Sinus implants were placed bilaterally in the ethmoid sinuses without incident.Septal splints (trimmed) were placed anterior to the middle turbinate after placement of the sinus implants.It is unknown whether the septal splints contacted the sinus implants.Within 12 hours of surgery, the patient felt "discomfort" in the back of his throat and went to the er.Upon examination by the ent physician on call, it was reported that the implant from the right side had migrated to the back of the patient's throat.The left side implant remained in place.The er physician removed the implant through the patient's oral cavity.The patient was seen by the surgeon one week post-op and reported to have experienced no harm from the migration and subsequent removal of the implant.The surgeon indicated that it is plausible that the septal splints could have potentially caused the dislodgement of the sinus implant.The patient is reportedly doing fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROPEL SINUS IMPLANT
Type of Device
DRUG ELUTING SINUS STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTERSECT ENT
menlo park CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTERSECT ENT
1555 adams dr
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer Contact
amy wolbeck
1555 adams dr
menlo park, CA 94025
6506412115
MDR Report Key5649020
MDR Text Key45005525
Report Number3010101669-2016-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100044
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/16/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model Number70011
Device Catalogue Number70011
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/16/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/11/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-