• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLSTENT¿ ENTERAL ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLSTENT¿ ENTERAL ENDOPROSTHESIS; STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number M00565590
Device Problem Material Perforation (2205)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) sheath wire perforation.The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2016 that a wallstent enteral stent was used during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the physician was not able to deploy the stent.The stent system was examined outside the patient and it was noted that stent wires perforated the outer sheath of the delivery system.The procedure was completed with another wallstent enteral stent.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A wallstent enteral stent and the delivery system were returned for analysis.Visual examination of the returned device found that the blue outer sheath was kinked near the proximal end of the device and several stent wires were found to have perforated the clear outer sheath near the distal end of the device.No other issues were identified during the product analysis device analysis determined that the condition of the returned device was consistent with the complaint incident.The noted damage to the returned device was consistent with the application of excessive force being applied to the delivery system and is likely due to anatomical or procedural factors.Therefore, a review and analysis of all available information indicated that the most probable root cause is operational context.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on april 19, 2016 that a wallstent enteral stent was used during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the physician was not able to deploy the stent.The stent system was examined outside the patient and it was noted that stent wires perforated the outer sheath of the delivery system.The procedure was completed with another wallstent enteral stent.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WALLSTENT¿ ENTERAL ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key5654858
MDR Text Key45197558
Report Number3005099803-2016-01252
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGB
PMA/PMN Number
K000281
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2017
Device Model NumberM00565590
Device Catalogue Number6559
Device Lot Number0018455052
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/09/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/19/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/13/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/18/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/02/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-