• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ECH060040J
Device Problems Break (1069); Occlusion Within Device (1423); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Thrombus (2101)
Event Date 02/29/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A review of the manufacturing records for the device verified that the lot met all pre-release specifications.An explant analysis is currently in process.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016, the patient was implanted with a gore® acuseal vascular graft in the upper arm to prepare a loop for arteriovenous access.Prolene suture 6-0 was used and the venous vessel diameter was 6mm.The patient tolerated the procedure.Cannulation to the gore® acuseal vascular graft was performed from the day after the initial implant procedure.The patient visited the clinic three times a week to receive dialysis treatment.Puncture sites were changed every time with 0.5cm - 1.0cm of intervals.It was stated that since the patient was diagnosed with schizophrenia, the nurses pressed the patient¿s arm by hand while cannulating the graft.It was reported to gore that on (b)(6) 2016, the patient presented with a graft occlusion.Urokinase was administered and a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) intervention was performed.It was reported that the graft was severely damaged at the puncture site due to multiple punctures and a large amount of thrombus was observed in the inner lumen.On (b)(6) 2016, another pta procedure was performed.An echocardiography revealed fibrin in the inner lumen and an unknown object that appeared like a delaminated intimal membrane of eptfe.On (b)(6) 2016, the existing gore® acuseal vascular graft was partially removed (portions of the graft at the arterial and venous anastomosis sites were left) and replaced with a non-gore surgical graft.The patient tolerated the procedure.It was stated that thrombosis of the non-gore surgical graft occurred on (b)(6) 2016.The explanted vascular graft has been returned to gore for further evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to w.L.Gore & associates for investigation.Submitted unfixed were two gore® acuseal vascular graft fragments (vgf-1 & vgf-2) and two tissue fragments (tf-1 & tf-2).Vgf-1 abluminal surface was generally devoid of overlying tissue with numerous semilunar aberrations.Within the central aspect of the lumen was friable pale tan soft tissue.In the center of the fragment the lumen contained a moderate quantity of friable pale tan soft tissue.Adherent to the luminal surface, along an area with moderate amount of semilunar aberrations, was a moderately firm white soft tissue mass which protruded into the lumen.Vgf-2 lumen was widely patent and the abluminal surface was devoid of soft tissue with a single semilunar aberration.Also present were two free floating tissue fragments (tf-1 & tf-2) of tan to dark brown friable soft tissue.Histopathological examination of four device/tissue specimens from vgf-1 were submitted: cross sections through the graft and luminal tissue from both poles, luminal tissue from the center of device and luminal tissue from a site with moderate aberrations, was performed.There was a scant quantity of abluminal collagenous tissue consistent with normal healing.The central region of the vgf-1 fragment was heavily cannulated.The cannulated area was associated with luminal collagen deposition which was confluent with a marked accumulation of ribbons and strands of loose and compacted thrombus.Grossly, under stereoscopic magnification, all layers were visible and structurally intact.No assessment of structural integrity can be made on the sections examined microscopically.Vgf-1, vgf-2, tf-1, and tf-2 were subjected to an enzymatic digestion process to remove biologic debris.Following digestion vgf-1 & vgf-2 were examined with the aid of a stereomicroscope.Tf-1 & tf-2 were consumed during digestion process.The identified findings were not associated with handling or manufacturing process at w.L.Gore & associates.The material aberrations identified are consistent with a surgical instrument and cannulation of a gore® acuseal vascular graft.All layers of the gore® acuseal vascular graft fragments were found to be intact and no evidence of delamination of the luminal eptfe was present.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® ACUSEAL VASCULAR GRAFT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL WEST B/P
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer Contact
sandra whicker
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key5664443
MDR Text Key45473848
Report Number2017233-2016-00497
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K130215
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/02/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/07/2018
Device Catalogue NumberECH060040J
Device Lot Number4812842PP006
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/27/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received05/18/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/08/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-