• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Inadequate or Insufficient Training (1643); Battery Problem (2885); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/23/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable components are: product id 3889-28, lot# v011665, implanted: (b)(6) 2006, product type: lead; product id neu_unknown_lead, lot# unknown, product type: lead.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported the patient's leads were not checked at the time of a replacement ((b)(6) 2014) and did not get checked until (b)(6) 2016.At this time the patient was told there battery would only last another two years.The patient later reported the date of the appointment was (b)(6) 2016.The patient was down to only one working lead and this was causing the battery to decline quicker.The patient was upset by this as their first implant lasted eight years and felt the manufacturer representative (rep) should have checked and found that only one lead was working.No falls/trauma was related to the issue.No patient symptoms reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a healthcare provider (hcp) via manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient.It was reported there was high impedances on all electrodes, all greater than 4,000 ohms.The hcp ran impedances at 2v and there was no change.The patient was programmed on case and 2, the only programmable options.There were no symptoms experienced by the patient as they were receiving optimal therapy.The issue was resolved at the time of the report.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a patient.It was reported no one had called the patient regarding their prior complaint.The patient restated that their new implantable neurostimulator (ins) was not working correctly, they were tired of running to the bathroom and wanted new leads that were going to work correctly.The patient noted they felt stimulation a little but it did not help with their trips to the bathroom and they had no symptom relief.They mentioned only having one program and were unable to troubleshoot as they were at work.The manufacturer representative (rep) had told the patient that the manufacturer would not replace the leads and told them to file a complaint with the manufacturer.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a patient.It was reported the patient thought the healthcare provider (hcp) was not trained to check the implantable neurostimulator (ins) and the lead with the physician programmer (php) until 14 months after the surgery, which was at the beginning of 2016.The patient stated the hcp had told them that only 3 of the four contacts were working and that as a result the ins was draining/depleting at a much faster rate than it normally would.Information later indicated only one contact on the lead was working.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Due to imdrf harmonization, any previously submitted device, method, result, and conclusion codes no longer apply to this event.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key5664916
MDR Text Key45478453
Report Number3004209178-2016-09805
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/18/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2016
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/23/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/18/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
06/21/2016
03/18/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/18/2016
06/13/2016
06/23/2016
07/13/2016
09/22/2017
03/18/2019
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age54 YR
-
-