• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. CONTINUOUS PERIPHERAL NERVE BLOCK KIT; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. CONTINUOUS PERIPHERAL NERVE BLOCK KIT; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ASK-19608-US1
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The returned device investigation report has not been submitted at this time.The manufacturer will continue to monitor and trend related events.
 
Event Description
Reported event: the floor nurse removed the stimucath without incident and noticed that the tip of the catheter was not present.There was no visible wire component, just the polyurethane sheath.An x-ray was performed and there was no evidence of retained catheter.Upon examination, it was determined that the tip was retracted into the polyurethane sheath still intact.The patient's condition was reported as fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).The customer reported the distal tip retracted inside the extrusion on the catheter.The returned components were visually examined with and without magnification revealing that the snaplock appears typical with no observed defects or anomalies.Visual examination of the returned epidural catheter revealed that the catheter appears typical but used.The distal end of the catheter indicates the weld is present and intact; however, it appears most of the tip has retracted into the catheter's extrusion.No other anomalies or defects were observed.The customer also provided photos.The returned catheter was measured using a calibrated ruler.The catheter was returned in its entirety.No lot number was provided by the customer.A device history record review was performed based upon a lot number from sales history data.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with a relevant finding.Other remarks: an issue with the accurate trimming of the extrusion due to bad cut which could potentially cause the extrusion to move on the spring wire guide.Further investigation has been initiated regarding this complaint issue.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, the potential root cause of this complaint issue is manufacturing related.The manufacturer will continue to monitor and trend related events.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONTINUOUS PERIPHERAL NERVE BLOCK KIT
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
reading PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
312 commerce place
asheboro NC 27203
Manufacturer Contact
effie jefferson
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
9194332672
MDR Report Key5667376
MDR Text Key45574420
Report Number1036844-2016-00232
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberASK-19608-US1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/28/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/19/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/31/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-