• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORTISOL; ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY, CORTISOL, SALIVARY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORTISOL; ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY, CORTISOL, SALIVARY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 11875116122
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/15/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The customer stated that they received erroneous results for a total of five patient samples tested for cortisol.The samples were used to compare results from the cortisol assay to results from the cortisol ii assay on an e602 analyzer.The cortisol ii assay is not sold in the united states, nor is it like or similar to a product sold in the united states.It was asked, but it is not known if the cortisol results were reported outside of the laboratory.The customer did not know which results were correct.The customer confirmed that none of the affected samples were collected from patients who used steroids.No error messages were received on the analyzer when testing.The first sample resulted as 25.78 ug/dl when tested with cortisol and resulted as 13.56 ug/dl when tested with cortisol ii.The second sample, from a (b)(6) year old male, resulted as 7.66 ug/dl when tested with cortisol and resulted as 2.78 ug/dl when tested with cortisol ii.The third sample, collected from a (b)(6) year old female on (b)(6) 2016, resulted as 12.08 ug/dl when tested with cortisol and resulted as 3.13 ug/dl when tested with cortisol ii.The fourth sample, collected from a (b)(6) year old female on (b)(6) 2016, resulted as 53.55 ug/dl when tested with cortisol and resulted as 21.22 ug/dl when tested with cortisol ii.The fifth sample, collected from a (b)(6) year old male on (b)(6) 2016, resulted as 28.48 ug/dl when tested with cortisol and resulted as 14.91 ug/dl when tested with cortisol ii.The patients were not adversely affected.The serial number of the used e602 analyzer was asked for, but not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A specific root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.Additional information required for the investigation was requested, but not provided.A general reagent could not be seen based on the provided data.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer provided the patient samples for further investigation.For investigations, each sample was tested for cortisol using the cortisol and cortisol ii assays on a cobas 8000 analyzer on 06/01/2016.The samples were tested for cortisol with an lc-ms/ms method.One sample (sample 4) was also tested on a centaur analyzer.All samples were also treated with polyethylene glycol (peg) precipitation and then tested for cortisol and cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer on 06/01/2016.The first sample resulted as 26.86 ug/dl when tested for cortisol and resulted as 14.06 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The sample was also tested for cortisol using the lc-ms/ms method, resulting as 14.273 ug/dl.When the sample was treated with peg precipitation, it resulted as 14.03 ug/dl for cortisol and as 7.17 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The second sample resulted as 8.57 ug/dl when tested for cortisol and resulted as 2.90 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The sample was also tested for cortisol using the lc-ms/ms method, resulting as 2.573 ug/dl.When the sample was treated with peg precipitation, it resulted as 4.98 ug/dl for cortisol and as 1.45 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The third sample resulted as 12.93 ug/dl when tested for cortisol and resulted as 3.30 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The sample was also tested for cortisol using the lc-ms/ms method, resulting as 1.538 ug/dl.When the sample was treated with peg precipitation, it resulted as 8.30 ug/dl for cortisol and as 1.57 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The fourth sample resulted as 55.23 ug/dl when tested for cortisol and resulted as 22.10 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The sample was also tested for cortisol using the lc-ms/ms method, resulting as 4.793 ug/dl.The sample was also tested on a centaur analyzer, resulting as 29.5 ug/dl.When the sample was treated with peg precipitation, it resulted as 36.39 ug/dl for cortisol and as 10.60 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The fifth sample resulted as 29.97 ug/dl when tested for cortisol and resulted as 15.06 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.The sample was also tested for cortisol using the lc-ms/ms method, resulting as 15.673 ug/dl.When the sample was treated with peg precipitation, it resulted as 15.78 ug/dl for cortisol and as 7.47 ug/dl for cortisol ii on the cobas 8000 analyzer.No adverse events were alleged.The cobas 8000 analyzer serial number was (b)(4).Cortisol reagent lot number 122033, with an expiration date of april 2017 was used on this analyzer.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was stated that the patients were not taking steroid medication.The customer was informed of the investigation results.A specific root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.The investigation results confirmed the customer's results.The differences seen between the cortisol and cortisol ii assays can be explained by the use of a new monoclonal antibody for the cortisol ii assay.The antibody is more specific and shows a lower cross-reactivity than the cortisol polyclonal antibody.The lc-ms/ms method used is very likely standardized differently than the cortisol and cortisol ii assays, which would explain the difference in results to the elecsys and centaur methods.No indication of interference was found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CORTISOL
Type of Device
ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY, CORTISOL, SALIVARY
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key5669445
MDR Text Key45587479
Report Number1823260-2016-00664
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NHG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K070788
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/06/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2017
Device Catalogue Number11875116122
Device Lot Number122033
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/10/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/20/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/06/2016
06/22/2016
07/06/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
-
-