• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problems Under-Sensing (1661); Device Sensing Problem (2917)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/25/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Suspect device udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient's implanted generator was unable to verify heart rate measurements.This was attempted both within surgery and post-operative recovery.The patient's programmed current was reportedly enabled during the attempts to verify heart-rate.This was verified through the available programming history.All sensitivity values were attempted.There were no reported communication issues, and the diagnostic testing was within normal limits.The pre-surgical evaluation was not performed because the patient would not sit still long enough to get ecg readings.The surgeon reportedly placed the generator within the pocket as close to the heart as possible.The generator's device history record was reviewed, and all specifications were met prior to distribution.No additional pertinent information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Downloaded internal device data was reviewed by the manufacturer.Sensitivity values used in lines of interrogated or diagnostic data were on lines 3 and 5.The foreground heart rate measured 60.0 bpm for each of these lines.The 60.0 bpm value in this instance represents a stale value that can indicate no valid r-r intervals were detected for an extended amount of time.Battery status was ok throughout the available data, and impedance values while the device was implanted were within normal limits.A follow up appointment with the patient's provider attempted heart rate detection with sensitivity values 4 and 5, both without success.The full troubleshooting procedure recommended by the manufacturer was not taken at that time.
 
Event Description
Troubleshooting was performed to test the heart rate verification on (b)(6) 2016.After interrogation and diagnostics, output currents were programmed to 0.The sensitivity value was noted to be 5.The heart rate verification registered a stable heart rate of approximately 72 bmp.The option to test another sensitivity value was taken to see if it is the best value.Sensitivity value 2 was then chosen.The heart rate readings fluctuated between 60 and 130 bmp and did not appear to be accurate.Sensitivity setting 3 was attempted with stable heart rate similar to setting 5.The sensitivity setting was left at 3.Current values were re-enabled to previous settings.Review of the internal device data from this appointment verified that the detected heart rate was within a physiological range and reached a registered value of 76.7 bpm with the sensitivity value of 3.
 
Event Description
It was reported that heart rate could not be detected on the patient¿s generator.The output currents were reportedly left on during this attempt to detect heart rate.No additional pertinent information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Programming history and internal device data from the generator was reviewed.In the last available appointment, the data shows three lines of interrogation or diagnostic data where tachycardia detection was enabled.The foreground heart rate measured 97.9, 74.3, and 74.3 for those three lines.Sensitivity values used in these lines were setting 3 only, although 4 and 5 were present for programming actions.The internal data showed 90 tachycardia detections and 88 delivered autostimulations.Tachycardia detection and output currents were both on throughout the office visit.No anomalies were apparent from the data present.No additional pertinent information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5670079
MDR Text Key46781153
Report Number1644487-2016-01068
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/10/2017
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number203513
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/25/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/20/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/24/2016
09/14/2016
01/03/2017
01/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/16/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age58 YR
-
-