The devices were returned and analyzed as part of the (b)(4) study.This is late information received from the (b)(4), which was reported as expected to the ps studies program, but inadvertently not recognized as 803 reportable until after the close of the study.Report 1032347-2006-00007 was submitted for this event, however there are two explanted devices.The possible mode of failure: clinical and mechanical evidence suggests twisting of the explanted fossa verified at the time of surgery and possibly a result of the mal-articulation of the head of the condyle to the medial articular surface that led to the dislocation, resulting in failure of the device.The probable cause of failure: clinical and mechanical data suggest a revision surgery due to technique failure, related to incorrect placement of the device.The device had been implanted for 2 weeks when dislocated.Report two of two for the same event, reference 1032347-2006-00007.
|