• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP REDIKIT,W/EPINEPHRIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOPERSURGICAL, INC. LEEP REDIKIT,W/EPINEPHRIN Back to Search Results
Model Number 6061
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/29/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be verified due to the absence of the affected sample(s), it unclear whether the issue was with the syringe or needle.Three sealed kits were returned.Visual and functional verification did not reveal any concern, all expected tray contents were present and syringes worked as expected.A review of the two product complaint history noted that this reported incident was the first to be reported.The root cause as to why the needle detached from the lure is indeterminable due to the absence of the objective evidence, but it may be that the needle was improperly secured to the syringe luer.At this time it's believed that this occurrence was an isolated incident, the incident will be monitored for any possible trending.
 
Event Description
The patient was having a leep procedure done and the needle came out of the luer lock and remained in the patients cervix.The doctor was able to retrieve the needle and no harm was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation: x-initiated manufacturer's investigation: no sample returned; review dhr.X-inspect returned samples: inspect stock product.Analysis and findings: the reported event could not be verified due to the absence of the affected sample(s), it unclear whether the issue was with the syringe or needle.Three sealed kits were returned, visual and functional verification did not reveal any concern, all expected tray contents were present and syringes worked as expected.A review of the (b)(4) product complaint history noted that this reported incident was the (b)(4) to be reported.The root cause as to why the needle detached from the lure is indeterminable due to the absence of the objective evidence, but it may be that the needle was improperly secured to the syringe lure.At this time it's believed that this occurrence was an isolated incident, the incident will be monitored for any possible trending.Corrective actions: correction and/or corrective action: corrective action is not applicable at this time as the root cause was indeterminable due to the absence of the affected product sample(s).All sealed and unopened product that was returned proved to work as expected.Corrective action level 3: train personnel; x-none.Reason: per bsr-qar-026 this complaint will be monitored for trending in that no injury was reported to end user, or patient.Was the complaint confirmed: no; review and closure: x-recommended continuous improvement program (cip).Preventative action activity: reviewed.Trend and monitor to cip.
 
Event Description
"the patient was having a leep procedure done and the needle came out of the luer lock and remained in the patients cervix.The doctor was able to retrieve the needle and no harm was reported." (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEEP REDIKIT,W/EPINEPHRIN
Type of Device
LEEP REDIKIT,W/EPINEPHRIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer Contact
nana banafo
75 corporate drive
trumbull, CT 06611
2036015200
MDR Report Key5691190
MDR Text Key47342077
Report Number1216677-2016-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HEE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K910253
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date10/31/2016
Device Model Number6061
Device Catalogue Number6061
Device Lot Number192335
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device Age6 YR
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/22/2016
Initial Date FDA Received06/01/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/01/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured01/22/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-