• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302-20

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302-20 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem Degraded (1153)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 05/09/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
Patient underwent generator and lead explant due to voice alteration and coughing associated with vns stimulation.The surgery was reported to be for patient comfort and was not to preclude a serious injury.During the surgery on (b)(6) 2016, the surgeon noted a lead discontinuity.The explanted devices have not been received to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted devices was received on 06/02/2016.The generator performed according to functional specifications.Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.An analysis was performed on the returned lead portions and the reported allegations of; 'fracture of lead(s)' (lead section) was not confirmed.A portion of the lead assembly including the electrodes was not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.The abraded openings found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing.For the observed inner tubing fluid remnants, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process.With the exception of the observed abraded opening the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No obvious anomalies were noted.The set screw marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.Based on the findings in the product analysis lab, there is no evidence to suggest a discontinuity in the returned portions of the device which may have contributed to the stated allegation of 'fracture of lead(s)'.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302-20
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5700121
MDR Text Key47892873
Report Number1644487-2016-01243
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/09/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/29/2012
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number2284
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/02/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/09/2016
Initial Date FDA Received06/05/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/27/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/12/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age27 YR
-
-