The surgeon reported that on three (3) surgeries performed that day, the surgeon experienced instability of chambers repeatedly.It is noted that the surgeon was starting at the same time the practice of nano incisions in 2.0mm.The company sales representative noted this practice favors the compression of the sleeve.This case was completed after performing an anterior vitrectomy.The patient was sent to a retina specialist at another facility.Additional information received from company sales representative noted he observed surgery with the surgeon.The surgeon completed seven (7) cataract surgeries, which went perfectly.The surgeon is completely satisfied with the system, and by the i/a in particular.The surgeon used the new i/a handpiece versus the old model last time.The surgeon stayed in 2.0 mm and he did not particularly change his technique of the incision, except for the positioning of the sleeve on the tip which he pushed a bit more.The company service representative adjusted the settings to the surgeon¿s satisfaction.The company sales representative tested the circuit and the system's vacuum was increasing correctly upon tip obstruction.No abnormality was detected.No system message displayed.There is no information to suggest the system had any nonconformity or that it caused the reported event.The system was manufactured on september 10, 2015.Based on qa assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The root cause cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|