Model Number SC-8336-50 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Material Separation (1562); Component Missing (2306)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 05/06/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).It is indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history records will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental med watch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that during a revision procedure, it was noted that one of the contacts of the lead was lost.X-ray was taken and the lost contact was not inside the patient's body.It was unknown if the contact disappeared on or before the surgery.The lead was placed back to where it was.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that during a revision procedure, it was noted that one of the contacts of the lead was lost.X-ray was taken and the lost contact was not inside the patient's body.It was unknown if the contact disappeared on or before the surgery.The lead was placed back to where it was.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information was received that the patient underwent a revision procedure to replace the lead with a missing contact.Replacement was per physician's preference.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that during a revision procedure, it was noted that one of the contacts of the lead was lost.X-ray was taken and the lost contact was not inside the patient's body.It was unknown if the contact disappeared on or before the surgery.The lead was placed back to where it was.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information was received that the patient underwent a revision procedure to replace the lead.Fluoroscopy showed that there were contacts missing on the lead.Replacement was per physician's preference.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that during a revision procedure, it was noted that one of the contacts of the lead was lost.X-ray was taken and the lost contact was not inside the patient's body.It was unknown if the contact disappeared on or before the surgery.The lead was placed back to where it was.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation indicated that the complaint has been confirmed.Three electrodes were dislodged and missing (e#8, 24, and 32).One cable was fractured (e16).The associated cables were exposed as the bare cables were pulled out of the paddle.The cause of the electrode dislodgement could not be determined.Review of the device history record revealed no anomalies.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that during a revision procedure, it was noted that one of the contacts of the lead was lost.X-ray was taken and the lost contact was not inside the patient's body.It was unknown if the contact disappeared on or before the surgery.The lead was placed back to where it was.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|