• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310030
Device Problem Hole In Material (1293)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/10/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a hole in the catheter was noted.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and calcified left anterior descending (lad) artery.A 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus was selected for use.During the procedure, a hole was noted on the shaft and saline was leaking.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complication were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the complaint device was returned for evaluation.Returned product consisted of the rotablator rotalink plus device.The advancer unit and burr unit were received together as a single unit.The advancer knob was received tightened in a backward position.The sheath was microscopically and visually inspected.There was a split/tear in the sheath 22cm from the strain relief on the catheter body housing.There were also, numerous kinks throughout the sheath.Functional testing was performed by connecting the rotablator rotalink plus device to the rotablator control console system.When the drip line was turned on, water started leaking from the hole in the sheath.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical/procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a hole in the catheter was noted.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the mildly tortuous and calcified left anterior descending (lad) artery.A 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus was selected for use.During the procedure, a hole was noted on the shaft and saline was leaking.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complication were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5722340
MDR Text Key47286289
Report Number2134265-2016-04954
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2018
Device Model NumberH749236310030
Device Catalogue Number23631-003
Device Lot Number19055314
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/08/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/17/2016
Initial Date FDA Received06/14/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/24/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
-
-