Although the report was for 1 set screw back out at the right side of the l5, the left side was returned as well.Both are of the same manufacturing lot number.A review of the device history records revealed no irregularities.The implants were found to be properly manufactured and released according to design specifications.The wear patterns on the right l5 backed out set screw are not typical of known wear patterns identified on either backed out set screws or ones which have performed as intended.High resolution images revealed damage/wear to the outer perimeter as well as a very faint rod contact markings produced during the final tightening process.The rod contact marking is especially faint on one side of the set screw.The l5 left side set screw shows damage to both the leading thread and the id hexalobe feature.This indicates there may have been some difficulty initially starting the threading process during attachment/union with the pedicle screw.The rod contact marking is also atypical.The damage demonstrates some contact was made but does not indicate clear contact on one side.This indicates that the rod may have been at an angle or in a position which prevented proper contact with the set screw during final tightening process.The provided mri images from the re-operation do not indicate that the rod angle would have been a concern since this is a one-level construct.The re-operation features a rod with very little curvature and straight forward screw angles.However, the construct upon re-operation could be significantly different from the original construct.The markings on the returned set screws indicate uneven loading and atypical damage.Based on the information available, it appears that the uneven loading may have led to insufficient set screw/rod contact resulting in the set screw backing out of the construct.
|