• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE JETSTREAM® XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE JETSTREAM® XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 112264-001
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/18/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a jetstream xc-2.1 atherectomy catheter in one piece.Visual inspection of the catheter shaft revealed no irregularities.During connection of the catheter pod to the console the connector had difficulty engaging into the console connector.Further examination of the connector revealed bent pins in the connector.Engineers from the research and development group as well as from the design assurance group also analyzed the issue with this complaint.Their findings were that the positive motor voltage pin #19, was bent and making continuous contact with the rex pin #8 and causing constant power to the rex function of the device which caused the rex rotation to stay active during the release of the rex button.Bent pins in the connector could give system errors that the customer experienced.Functional testing of the device could not be completed due to the damaged pins in the connector.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the motor kept spinning with the activation button not depressed.A 2.1mm jetstream® xc atherectomy catheter was selected for an atherectomy procedure in the popliteal segment of the right leg.Upon activation of the jetstream device, the motor kept spinning with the activation button not depressed.The retraction (rex) button was attempted to remedy the issue; however, when depressed, it would not engage nor did it stop the forward (activation) spinning of the burr.Due to the inability to cease the burr from spinning, the console was electrically powered down while the catheter was in the body.Once powered down, the catheter was removed from the patient without incident.An attempt to re-prime the device was performed; however the device was not able to prime and at this time a pod error light appeared on the console.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JETSTREAM® XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5734037
MDR Text Key47701835
Report Number2134265-2016-06029
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130637
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2017
Device Model Number112264-001
Device Catalogue NumberPV31300
Device Lot Number18854644
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/31/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/17/2016
Initial Date FDA Received06/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/29/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-