(b)(4).Method: the complaint mr850 respiratory humidifier was returned to the fisher & paykel healthcare service centre in the (b)(6), where it was inspected and performance checked by a trained service engineer (as per the product technical manual).Our investigation is accordingly based on the service report from the service centre, our knowledge of the product and information reported by the hospital.Results: no fault was found with the subject mr850 respiratory humidifier during the performance check.The hospital reported that an intersurgical breathing circuit and an intersurgical humidification chamber was used, with the disconnection occurring between the inspiratory limb and chamber.Conclusion: no fisher & paykel healthcare product was found to cause or contribute to the reported incident.The cause of the incident was a disconnect between the intersurgical brand inspiratory limb and intersurgical brand chamber.The mr850 respiratory humidifier is used to warm and humidify gases delivered to patients requiring mechanical ventilation, positive pressure breathing assistance or medical gases.The subject mr850 was found to operate normally and within specification during the performance check.The user instructions and product technical manual for the mr850 respiratory humidifier both state the following: -'the use of breathing circuits, chambers or other accessories which are not approved by fisher & paykel healthcare may impair performance or compromise safety.' therefore, based on the investigation conducted and the information reported by the hospital, we conclude that the mr850 respiratory humidifier did not cause or contribute to the reported event.(note: an initial report was submitted as fisher & paykel healthcare was still gathering further information on the reported incident at the time.The investigation has since established that the mr850 respiratory humidifier did not cause or contribute to the reported incident, and this final report is meant to provide closure of the initial report.).
|