(b)(4).Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: additional information requested: can you please clarify the statement you made regarding the device clips were "bent or get stuck".Did the device fire clips that were malformed? yes.Or did "bent" clips fall out of the device without being fired? when the clips were "stuck", did the device not fire clips at all? file will remain same upon review of follow up received from affiliate.The analysis results found that the er320 device was returned with a clip in the jaws; the clip was removed in order to measure the jaws and they were found within specification.In an attempt to replicate the reported incident, the device was tested for functionality.During the analysis, the device was cycled and it fed, retained and formed the remaining 14 clips as intended.In order to evaluate the condition of the internal components of the device, it was disassembled.Upon disassembling, no anomalies were noted.As the device was found to be fully functional, it could not be determined what may have caused the reported incident.The batch history record was reviewed and no defects, ncr¿s or protocols related to the complaint, were found during the manufacturing process.
|