• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER KNEE CREATIONS, INC. ACCUFILL 5CC; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE BONE VOID FILLER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER KNEE CREATIONS, INC. ACCUFILL 5CC; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE BONE VOID FILLER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 07/15/2013
Event Type  No Answer Provided  
Event Description
Clinical data review patient had a total knee replacement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient involved with this complaint is a (b)(6) female that presented with medial knee pain.The patient had a history of bilateral hip replacements (right hip 2006, left hip (b)(6) 2012).An mri obtained on (b)(6) 2012 demonstrated a medial meniscus tear with a bone marrow lesion in the anterior central portion of the medial tibial plateau measuring 0.88cm x 1.35cm x 1.12cm.The patient consented to be enrolled in a prospective clinical study for subchondroplasty and underwent a subchondroplasty procedure on (b)(6) 2012.The operative notes were not available for this investigation.However, the clinical study case report form indicated that 4 cc of accufill material was injected into the tibial plateau and that an arthroscopy was performed at the same time.No complications were reported at the time of surgery.The patient reported a preoperative pain level of 8/10 which improved slightly to 6/10 at 1 and 6 weeks postoperatively.However, the patient reported the pain level returning to 8/10 at 3 and 6 months.This was also confirmed by the knee injury and osteoarthritis score (koos) pain component which improved from 30.6/100 points to 52.8 at 6 weeks, but worsened to 25/100 at 6 months.Similarly, the patient reported improvement in function as evidenced by the koos adl score from 35.3/100 preop to 47.1/100 at 6 weeks, but reported worsening function at 6 months with a score of 30.9/100.During the patients 6 month follow-up visit on (b)(6) 2012, the evaluating physician noted that the patient had also been recently diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis and was placed on methotrexate.Per the study protocol, the patient also obtained a new mri on (b)(6) 2013.During a clinic visit on (b)(6) 2013, the treating physician administered a synvisc 1 injection into the study knee and evaluated the mri.The physician noted worsening chondromalacia in the patella-femoral joint, a diminutive medial meniscus posterior horn and the presence of a new region of bone marrow edema in the medial femoral condyle.The physician also described the region of the previous accufill injection in the tibial plateau as "new changes which may be consistent with some avn of the medial tibial plateau" and "new signal abnormality medial tibial plateau consistent with bone infarct/osteonecrosis." unfortunately, the mr images were unavailable for this investigation.It is important to note that post-operative imaging of accufill injected into cancellous bone is often misdiagnosed as avn or a bone infarct.Since the post-operative mri is unavailable, the presence of avn cannot be confirmed or excluded.On (b)(6) 2013, the patient returned to the clinic for a follow-up evaluation reported a knee pain level of 10/10.New radiographs were order which demonstrated severe medial osteoarthritis with joint space narrowing, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis and subchondral cysts.Treatment options were discussed with the patient including total joint replacement.The patient elected to undergo total joint replacement on (b)(6) 2013.No operative notes were available for the total knee replacement procedure.However, clinic notes from a follow-up visit on (b)(6) 2013 indicated that the patient was doing well with no complaints of pain or discomfort.Radiographs obtained during that visit indicated a well fixed total knee implant with no evidence of complications.It is unclear from the evidence provided whether the accufill implant site failed and contributed to the ongoing knee pain in this patient or if the worsening symptoms was a result of continued progression of the pre-existing osteoarthritis in the medial compartment as evidenced by the degenerative meniscus, new bone marrow lesions in the femoral condyle and worsening of osteoarthritis in the patella-femoral joint.Operative notes documenting the status and quality of the bone at the time of revision surgery were unavailable.However, the revision surgery appeared to be successful according to the post-operative clinic notes.Device was not made available.
 
Event Description
Clinical data review patient had a total knee replacement.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCUFILL 5CC
Type of Device
CALCIUM PHOSPHATE BONE VOID FILLER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER KNEE CREATIONS, INC.
841 springdale drive
exton PA 19341
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZIMMER KNEE CREATIONS, INC.
841 springdale drive
exton PA 19341
Manufacturer Contact
victor krone
841 springdale drive
exton, PA 19341
4848794224
MDR Report Key5773498
MDR Text Key49054446
Report Number3008812173-2016-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQV
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
PN/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/06/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/06/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/06/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/06/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-