• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_STRYKER CEMENT; BONE CEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_STRYKER CEMENT; BONE CEMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_LIM
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Use of Device Problem (1670); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 06/14/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Patient complained of pain.Piece of cement was in the posterior aspect of the joint.Liner was removed and the cement.New liner was implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding user error involving a unknown cement mix was reported.The event was confirmed.Method and results: device evaluation could not be performed as the subject device was not returned.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "the primary harm involved is revision surgery due to a technical complication from the index procedure.Following implantation of the pkr in the index surgery the extruded cement was not completely removed in the posterior aspect of the articulation.This led to a mechanical complication pain necessitating revision surgery.One of the difficulties encountered and performing partial knee replacement is limited visualization afforded to the surgeon particularly in the posterior aspect of your articulation.No implant or manufacturing defect was identified in this review." conclusions: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated "the primary harm involved is revision surgery due to a technical complication from the index procedure.Following implantation of the pkr in the index surgery the extruded cement was not completely removed in the posterior aspect of the articulation.This led to a mechanical complication pain necessitating revision surgery.One of the difficulties encountered and performing partial knee replacement is limited visualization afforded to the surgeon particularly in the posterior aspect of your articulation.No implant or manufacturing defect was identified in this review." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time as no devices and/or insufficient information was received by stryker orthopaedics.If devices and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient complained of pain.Piece of cement was in the posterior aspect of the joint.Liner was removed and the cement.New liner was implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN_STRYKER CEMENT
Type of Device
BONE CEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NA
Manufacturer Contact
keyla colon
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5787413
MDR Text Key49333316
Report Number0002249697-2016-02249
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/14/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_LIM
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/11/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/12/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
Patient Weight87
-
-