• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH #3 4:1 CUTTING BLOCK; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH #3 4:1 CUTTING BLOCK; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6541-1-703
Device Problem Sticking (1597)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/16/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
After the 4 in 1 cut was complete on the femur the doctor removed the cutting block in a usual fashion.One of the posts on the back of femur stayed in place and the doctor used plier to remove.There was no delay and the doctor went about finishing the case per usual.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding a fixation peg disassociating from a triathlon guide was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual, dimensional and functional analysis could not be performed as the device was not returned.Medical records received and evaluation: not performed as there was no indication that patient factors contributed to the reported event.Device history review: all devices accepted into final stock conformed to specification.This review confirmed the device was manufactured prior to capa implementation.Complaint history review: there have been 3 similar previous reported events for this lot id.Conclusions: the investigation concluded that the reported fixation peg disassociating from the triathlon guide was likely caused by a manufacturing nonconformance.Inspection of the reported device would be required for confirmation.It was concluded from the scope of a capa that the supplier, (b)(6), had not performed the required press fit operation between the peg and block and had reamed the cutting block hole oversized which led to the pin coming out of the assembly.Stryker reserves the right to re-evaluate this investigation if additional relevant information becomes available.Not returned.
 
Event Description
After the 4 in 1 cut was complete on the femur the doctor removed the cutting block in a usual fashion.One of the posts on the back of femur stayed in place and the doctor used plier to remove.There was no delay and the doctor went about finishing the case per usual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
#3 4:1 CUTTING BLOCK
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
keyla colon
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5789727
MDR Text Key50185125
Report Number0002249697-2016-02273
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JWH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K143393
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/16/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number6541-1-703
Device Lot NumberSBYC04
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/16/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/13/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/28/2004
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient Weight65
-
-