• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9004
Device Problem Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/16/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the sample was not returned to the user facility; therefore, evaluation of the actual sample is unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed this is the only complaint associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) shows the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual sample was not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.If additional information is obtained, a supplemental report will be submitted with all relevant information.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter allegedly was torn while advancing the catheter to the proximal portion of the mid- distal superficial femoral artery (sfa).The health care professional (hcp) predilated a heavy calcified target lesion which was 300 mm in length with multiple inflations.The first lutonix dcb was advanced through a non tortuous pathway to the distal portion of the target lesion and treatment was successful.Reportedly, the second lutonix dcb was being advanced to the proximal portion of the target lesion, the hcp noted blood entering the indeflator which may indicate a material rupture in the balloon.The hcp never inflated the second lutonix dcb and it was removed successfully without retraction difficulties through the sheath.The procedure was completed with another drug coated balloon.Post-operative imaging was conducted from the lesion down to the foot, reportedly no indication of foreign material was present.The second lutonix dcb was discarded by the user facility and is not available for further evaluation.There was no reported impact or consequence to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer (Section G)
LUTONIX, INC
9409 science center dr
new hope MN 55428
Manufacturer Contact
mike gaffney
9409 science center dr
new hope, MN 55428
7634458639
MDR Report Key5793714
MDR Text Key49511285
Report Number3006513822-2016-00143
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ONU
UDI-Device Identifier00801741088759
UDI-Public(01)00801741088759(17)180325(10)LUAQ0078
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/16/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/25/2018
Device Model Number9004
Device Catalogue NumberLX351305150
Device Lot NumberLUAQ0078
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received07/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age91 YR
Patient Weight45
-
-