Catalog Number 122136462 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Cellulitis (1768); Erythema (1840); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Seroma (2069); Skin Irritation (2076)
|
Event Date 06/20/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient was revised to address a skin/wound infection (cellulitis).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: this complaint is still under investigation.Depuy will notify the fda of the results of this investigation once it has been completed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Update - 7/25/16 pfs and medical records received.After review of the medical records for mdr reportability, there is no new additional information that would affect the existing investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient was revised to address a skin/wound infection (cellulitis) update 7/25/16- disc 342 pfs and medical records received.There is no new additional information that would affect the existing mdr decision.Examination of the reported devices was not possible as they were not returned.A search of the complaints databases finds no other reports against the product and lot code combinations since their release to distribution.The investigation can draw no conclusion with the information provided.Based on the inability to determine root cause, the need for corrective action has not been indicated.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received the investigation will be reopened.
|
|
Event Description
|
Update sep 12, 2017: legal medical records.After review of the medical records for the mdr reportability, in addition to what was previously reported, revision notes reported of large seroma which did not appear infected, and no frank puss.Microbiology reported negative for infection.Clinical notes reported increasing pain, erythema, tenderness and a large fluid collection which had the gross appearance of a seroma.This complaint was updated on oct 2, 2017.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).No device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch , a follow-up medwatch, will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provision of 21 cfr, part 803.The report may be based on the information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : null.Device history batch : null.Device history review : null.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Complaint description: patient was revised to address a skin/wound infection (cellulitis) update - 7/25/16 pfs and medical records received.After review of the medical records for mdr reportability, there is no new additional information that would affect the existing investigation.The complaint was updated on: 08/17/2016.Update sep 12, 2017: legal medical records.After review of the medical records for the mdr reportability, in addition to what was previously reported, revision notes reported of large seroma which did not appear infected, and no frank puss.Microbiology reported negative for infection.Clinical notes reported increasing pain, erythema, tenderness and a large fluid collection which had the gross appearance of a seroma.This complaint was updated on oct 2, 2017.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|