• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II ANNULOPLASTY RING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II ANNULOPLASTY RING Back to Search Results
Model Number 5200
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 06/06/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the annuloplasty ring holder was returned to edwards for analysis.As received, one (1) side of the clip of the holder was found broken off.The broken clip piece was returned with the rest of the ring holder.Edges of the broken piece matched up with rest of the holder.The annuloplasty ring was not returned with the holder and no other inconsistencies were detected.(b)(4).The clinical report of a broken ring holder could be confirmed through visual observations.Holders that fragment when in use within the operative field have the potential to result in a piece being retained in the heart that could then embolize when the patient¿s heart begins beating.This malfunction has the potential to cause a stroke or myocardial infarction.In this case, although a broken piece was found lying in the operative field, the piece was removed by the assisting surgeon and the corresponding broken piece matched up to the holder upon return to edwards lifesciences.The annuloplasty ring was not returned to edwards as it remains implanted in the patient with no reported complications.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received information that the holder for this annuloplasty ring broke during a procedure.As reported, the operating room staff was attaching the handle to the holder with a lot of force.At this time, the portion of the holder which attaches to the handle broke.The edwards representative noticed a broken piece lying in the operative field and the assisting surgeon retrieved it.The annuloplasty ring remains implanted and there were no further complications; the patient was noted as doing well, post-operatively.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II ANNULOPLASTY RING
Type of Device
ANNULOPLASTY RING
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
neil landry
1 edwards way
ms: t&d 2nd floor, office t223
irvine, CA 92614
9492502289
MDR Report Key5810037
MDR Text Key50066926
Report Number2015691-2016-02284
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K083470
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/23/2021
Device Model Number5200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/11/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
-
-