• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERAKOS, INC THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERAKOS, INC THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Lot Number REQUESTED NOT PROVIDED-KIT
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Diarrhea (1811); Fever (1858); Vomiting (2144); Malaise (2359)
Event Date 06/21/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The system was used for treatment.The kit lot number was not provided; therefore, a batch record review could not be performed.The (b)(4) lot number was not provided.However, a review of all (b)(4) lots manufactured since january 2013 was performed.No trends or nonconformances related to the complaint were noted.Trends were reviewed for complaint categories, malaise, fever, vomiting and diarrhea.No trends were detected for these complaint categories.From a device perspective, there is no known device malfunction.However, out of an abundance of caution, this case will be reported as an mdr, since the patient was admitted to the hospital post treatment.The assessment is based on information available at the time of the investigation.No product was returned for investigation; therefore, it could not be determined if the product met specification based solely on the information provided by the customer.Complaints are monitored through tracking and trending.If a trend is detected, further investigation will be conducted.Adverse event terms: malaise, fever, vomiting and diarrhea.(b)(4).Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that a patient wasn't feeling well, had developed a fever and was vomiting after an extracorporeal photopheresis (ecp) treatment on (b)(6) 2016.The customer stated that the patient was taken in for observation and was now stable.The customer stated that this was the patient's fourth ecp treatment cycle.On june 23, 2016, the customer stated that the patient had to be admitted to the ward after the ecp treatment on (b)(6) 2016.The customer reported that the patient was on a diuretic but was not taking the diuretic during her ecp treatments, since the patient was considered to be dehydrated at her first ecp treatment.The customer reported that the patient called after the first day of her fourth ecp treatment cycle to report that she felt sick, had diarrhea, and a fever.The customer stated that the patient was admitted to the ward and isolated in case of a virus.The customer reported that the patient spent the night in the ward and then had her ecp treatment the next day after being cleared by the doctor.The kit was not returned for investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
CELLEX
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERAKOS, INC
hampton NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
THERAKOS, INC.
10 north high street
suite 300
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
megan vernak
53 frontage road
hampton, NJ 08827
MDR Report Key5811079
MDR Text Key50059242
Report Number2523595-2016-00166
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNR
UDI-Device Identifier10705030100009
UDI-Public(01)10705030100009(11)150922
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNO
PMA/PMN Number
P860003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Nurse
Device Lot NumberREQUESTED NOT PROVIDED-KIT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age53 YR
Patient Weight50
-
-