• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES MONUMENT APPLICATION INSTRUMENT FOR STERNAL ZIPFIX; CERCLAGE FIXATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES MONUMENT APPLICATION INSTRUMENT FOR STERNAL ZIPFIX; CERCLAGE FIXATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.501.080
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
No reported patient or surgical involvement.Date of event: unknown.(b)(4).Device is an instrument and is not implanted or explanted.The complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.(b)(4).Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned.Service history record review: no service history review can be performed because the lot/serial number is unknown and cannot be traced.The manufacture date is unknown.The service history review is unconfirmed without a valid lot number, a review of the device history records cannot be requested.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that three (3) application instruments for sternal zipfix were found with trigger problems and bent fins during the sterilization process.At this time, it is unknown if the trigger issues and bent fins (which led to leaver movement and seating issues) affected all items or if it was one (1) identified malfunction per device.There was no reported patient or surgical involvement.This report is 3 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: date subject device was received by manufacturer for evaluation.A service and repair evaluation was performed for the subject device (application instrument for sternal zipfix, part number 03.501.080, lot number 9812895).The customer reported the fins were bent and the trigger was having problems.The repair technician reported the lever arm was bent.¿bent¿ is the reason for repair.The subject device is not repairable per the inspection sheet.The cause of the issue is unknown.The service and repair evaluation confirmed the complaint condition.The subject device was forwarded to synthes customer quality for additional investigation.A review of the service and device history records was completed for the subject device lot.Manufacturing location: synthes (b)(4).Date of manufacture jun 27, 2016.The review showed that there were no issues or nonconformances during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to the complaint condition.A product development investigation was performed for the subject device.The device was received with bent leaf springs (bent upward).The device was functionally tested and the bent springs are causing a sticking/jamming condition and not allowing the device to function as intended.Thus, the complaint condition is confirmed, consistent with the reported condition, and can be replicated.No further functional issues were observed.While a root cause of the issue with the trigger could not be determined, review of the failure mode and discussion with the product development subject matter expert determined that it is consistent with the result of not properly maintaining the device as indicated in the technique guide.This device is part of the sternal zipfix system and used to tension and cut the sternal zipfix implants.Proper use and maintenance is addressed in technique guide.The technique guide provides instructions for lubricating the device prior to sterilization and includes this location as one of the three specific locations to oil directly.As the details regarding the use and maintenance of this device are unknown a root cause cannot be definitively determined for this portion of the complaint.A review of the current drawing and history for the top level assembly was performed.The following component drawings were also reviewed; spring assembly and pusher assembly, end cap component and pusher sleeve component.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.No unaddressed issues or discrepancies relating to the complaint condition were observed and the current designs were determined to be suitable for their intended use when employed and maintained as recommended.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APPLICATION INSTRUMENT FOR STERNAL ZIPFIX
Type of Device
CERCLAGE FIXATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer Contact
terry callahan
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5813125
MDR Text Key50189029
Report Number2520274-2016-13570
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K110789
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03.501.080
Device Lot Number9812895
Other Device ID Number(01)10887587010847(10)9812895
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/07/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/21/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/30/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/27/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-