Model Number M-5463-01 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
|
Event Date 06/27/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The hardware investigation has begun but it has not been completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.Concomitant products: carto 3 system, model # m-4800-01, s/n: (b)(4).Smart touch bidirectional catheter, model # d-1327-05-s.3m grounding pad, model # 9135-lp.This stockert was manufactured before september 24, 2014; therefore no udi is applicable for this product with serial number (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure (unspecified) with a stockert generator and suffered burns second degree.There is no information regarding intervention provided.During a follow-up visit for a separate medical issue, the physician noticed that the patient had a grounding pad burn.Patent did not require extended hospitalization as a result of this event.It was noted that the account used a 97cm square 3m grounding pad (9135-lp).Physician's opinion regarding the cause of the adverse event is that it was related to the type of grounding pad, the 3m 9135-lp.Patient contact area and indifferent electrode were properly prepared, per the indifferent electrode instructions for use.Indifferent electrode was placed on the patient's back.Indifferent electrode used with the stockert generator was 97 cm square (not 124 cm square or larger).No error codes were reported on the stockert generator, and service for the generator was declined.Attempts have been made to obtain clarification to this complaint.However, no further information has been made available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure (unspecified) with a stockert generator and suffered second degree burns.Repair follow-up was performed, but service was declined and the device was not shipped.The complaint is not able to be confirmed.A device history record (dhr) review verified that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|