The patient was implanted with dual magec rods (ms1-5590s, lot# a120521-09-10-01u and ms1-5590r, lot# a140807-04-00-01u) on (b)(6) 2014, and it was alleged that during the first two (2) distraction sessions, the rods appeared to not be distracting; however, both rods distracted and functioned as expected when tested prior to implantation.Both rods were removed on (b)(6) 2016; the patient underwent a final fusion procedure, and was not implanted with new rods.To date, the patient is doing fine and no negative outcomes have been reported.A dhr review revealed that there were no deviations from the manufacturing process, and the device was released within specifications.
|