• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Shock (2072)
Event Date 07/02/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient experienced constant stimulation since 2 days ago.Patient visited the er regarding this and requested if tc could visit and disable the vns device.Patient was informed on how to use the magnet to disable the device instead.Clinic notes were received for patient's generator replacement referral.Notes dated (b)(6) 2016 indicated that the patient's vns device was interrogation and adjusted without incident.Patient tolerated the new settings.Diagnostics and lead checks were done without incident.Per note dated (b)(6) 2016, patient experienced pain around the vns that is a shock feeling on a nerve.Patient underwent prophylactic generator replacement on (b)(6) 2016.The explanted generator has not been received to date.Additional relevant information has not been received to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted generator was received on 7/28/2016.The reported ¿continuous stimulation¿ allegation was not confirmed in the pa lab.Test bench analysis of the device¿s output waveform utilizing an oscilloscope (especially to measure signal on and off times), which also included magnet placement (cyber watch) to inhibit the output waveform was performed.The pulse generator performed within specification requirements.Additionally, in the pa lab, the device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.Analysis in the pa lab concluded proper functionality of the pulse generator and that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that the patient's pain and feeling of constant stimulation began approximately on (b)(6) 2016.The generator replacement was planned as intervention for the pain and perception of constant stimulation and for prophylactic reasons.The surgical intervention was planned for patient comfort and not to preclude a serious injury.The physician reported that the cause of pain was due to presence of device.Although there is not evidence of battery depletion, the physician reported that the believed relationship of the constant stimulation to vns therapy is battery depletion.A dcdc - 6 was reported to have been observed for diagnostics.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5824050
MDR Text Key50515818
Report Number1644487-2016-01695
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2008
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1290
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/28/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/01/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/26/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/11/2016
12/21/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/19/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age41 YR
-
-