Catalog Number 405181 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Component Falling (1105)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 07/07/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
During a left shoulder arthrogram, the clinician attempted removing the needle used for contrast injection.At the end of the procedure, the needle tip broke off and remained in the subscapularis tendon in the patient's left shoulder.A ct was used to view the needle fragment and the needle was removed under sedation and using fluoroscopy.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information from medwatch: per report, the needle tip that broke off was 2.5cm and it had a 90 degree bend in it (as seen on ct).Initial reporter also sent report to the fda, yes or no.This information was submitted by the customer via medwatch reference#mw5063485.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information from medwatch: per report, the needle tip that broke off was 2.5cm and it had a 90 degree bend in it (as seen on ct).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial sample investigation: one used sample was returned for evaluation.The returned sample was visually examined for customer¿s reported issue.Sample revealed broken needle.Photos were taken and the sample was forwarded to the manufacturing site for a secondary investigation.At the date of this report, the sample has not yet been evaluated by the manufacturing site.However, the quality engineer evaluated the photos taken during the initial investigation and verified the needle had bent and broken off.Conclusion not yet available - evaluation in progress.In the event that new, changed, or corrected information is obtained, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: three (3) photos and the actual suspect device was submitted and examined visually which confirmed the condition of the broken needle.After sample evaluation, it was found that the condition is not related to the manufacturing process.The manufacturing and inspection records of the lot concerned were reviewed and no abnormality which could be related to the reported event was found.A review of the device history record revealed no irregularities during the manufacture of the reported lot # 5254988.Conclusion: an absolute root cause for this incident cannot be determined as bd was not able to duplicate or confirm the customers indicated failure mode.The condition of the device may be related to the insertion technique.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|