• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number P-50 PL
Device Problem No Flow (2991)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: the sample was returned but not investigated yet, therefore, the condition of the product was not verified.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the product was released according to the manufacturer's release criteria.Because a sample was not returned, the root cause cannot be determined.The root cause will be reassessed upon completing the investigation.Additional information has been requested.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A surgeon reported no flow of the aqueous humor during a glaucoma filtering device implant procedure.The device was removed and replaced during the initial procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Customer reported that no flow was confirmed after the shunt was implanted.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the product was released according to manufacturer's release criteria.The following findings were obtained during investigation of the returned product: during initial inner illumination test, partial blockage of the lumen was found.After cleaning the device the blockage was removed.Light passed through both sides of the restriction unit.Therefore, there is no indication for a manufacturing related factors that could cause the blockage.During production, 100% final inspection is being performed on the entire batch, including visual inspection and inner illumination.If a blockage would be noticed, the product would have been rejected immediately.Having said that, one may conclude that the blockage was formed after the product left the manufacturing plant.The root cause is inconclusive - unable to verify, since the blockage could have been caused by many different reasons during and after the clinical procedure.The blockage does not seem to be product related since after cleaning the device the blockage was removed.Therefore, there is no evidence for an inherent defect that might have caused the event.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
rita lopez
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8175514846
MDR Report Key5870209
MDR Text Key52747290
Report Number3003701944-2016-00168
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/18/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Model NumberP-50 PL
Device Catalogue Number60053
Device Lot Number072376
Other Device ID Number00380650705013
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/03/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/20/2016
Initial Date FDA Received08/11/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/18/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/08/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-