It was reported to a company representative by a surgeon that a patient had picked the generator scar site open and went to the er to get it closed again.The patient then picked it open again.Then the patient went to the surgeon to be evaluated, with no intention to have it explanted, however upon evaluation of the site it was severely infected.The surgeon decided to explant the lead and generator on (b)(6) 2016 for concern that the patient will continue to pick at the site even after it has healed again.After speaking with the patient's group home and neurologist it was stated that the vns was working for the patient.The patient had begun to pick on the neck site also, but it was not picked open at the time.The generator site was picked open to the point of re-opening the wound, but the lead was near the surface of the exposed wound, and was not exposed from the wound.The patient was referred to an infectious disease specialist to treat the infection.Review of the manufacturing records for the generator and lead revealed the devices were sterilized prior to distribution.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.
|