|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Leak/Splash (1354)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 07/13/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during a chemo-embolization procedure, 7 different three-way plastic stopcocks were used to mix the chemo therapeutic liquid, all 7 of the device were reported to be leaking from the rear of the faucet.The devices were reported to all be from the same lot number.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Investigation/evaluation: during the course of the investigation, a review of the complaint history, quality control, manufacturing instructions (mi), and trends of the product was conducted.The complaint device was not returned.Therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.It is feasible to suggest the stopcock body was cracked, which allowed leakage.It is not clear at what point the device could have been damaged.Initial analysis suggests that dimensional interference designed to ensure the sealing ability of the valve and prevent bypass may be too excessive.However a definitive root cause cannot be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints and have notified the appropriate internal personnel.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during a chemo-embolization procedure, 7 different three-way plastic stopcocks were used to mix the chemo therapeutic liquid, all 7 of the device were reported to be leaking from the rear of the faucet.The devices were reported to all be from the same lot number.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|