Model Number M0063903200 |
Device Problem
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/25/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stone cone nitinol urological retrieval coil was used during a transurethral ureterolithotripsy (tul) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2016.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the distal tip of the device was detached upon withdrawal and was left in the ureter.The detached piece was retrieved using forceps.The procedure was completed with this device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual analysis of the returned device found that the device was returned with the blue sheath removed.The cone was found broken and detached from the device.A scorch mark was noted at the break.Review and analysis of all available information indicates that the device damage was caused by the laser during ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy procedure.Therefore, the most probable root cause is "caused by other device".The device history record (dhr) review found the device met all manufacturing specifications.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label. .
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stone cone nitinol urological retrieval coil was used during a transurethral ureterolithotripsy (tul) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2016.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the distal tip of the device was detached upon withdrawal and was left in the ureter.The detached piece was retrieved using forceps.The procedure was completed with this device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|